Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 51
Filtrar
1.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 36(4): 823-831, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33880763

RESUMO

The maturing development in artificial intelligence (AI) and genomics has propelled the advances in intestinal diseases including intestinal cancer, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). On the other hand, colorectal cancer is the second most deadly and the third most common type of cancer in the world according to GLOBOCAN 2020 data. The mechanisms behind IBD and IBS are still speculative. The conventional methods to identify colorectal cancer, IBD, and IBS are based on endoscopy or colonoscopy to identify lesions. However, it is invasive, demanding, and time-consuming for early-stage intestinal diseases. To address those problems, new strategies based on blood and/or human microbiome in gut, colon, or even feces were developed; those methods took advantage of high-throughput sequencing and machine learning approaches. In this review, we summarize the recent research and methods to diagnose intestinal diseases with machine learning technologies based on cell-free DNA and microbiome data generated by amplicon sequencing or whole-genome sequencing. Those methods play an important role in not only intestinal disease diagnosis but also therapy development in the near future.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Diagnóstico do Sistema Digestório/tendências , Diagnóstico Precoce , Genômica/métodos , Enteropatias/diagnóstico , Aprendizado de Máquina/tendências , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala/métodos , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala/tendências , Humanos
2.
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am ; 31(1): 43-58, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33213799

RESUMO

The rapid increase in the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in Western populations over the past 4 decades and its associated poor prognosis, unless detected early has generated great interest in screening for the precursor lesion Barrett's esophagus (BE). Recently, there have been significant developments in imaging-based modalities and esophageal cell-sampling devices coupled with biomarker assays. In this review, the authors discuss the rationale for screening for BE and the factors to consider for targeting the at-risk population. They also explore future avenues for research in this area.


Assuntos
Esôfago de Barrett/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Diagnóstico do Sistema Digestório/tendências , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/diagnóstico , Esôfago de Barrett/epidemiologia , Biomarcadores/análise , Esôfago/patologia , Humanos , Incidência , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco
3.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32928869

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Wide-area transepithelial sampling (WATS) is a new technique that uses an abrasive brush to obtain samples from a larger surface area of the oesophagus. Studies have shown promising results that WATS in adjunct to forceps biopsy (FB) increases the detection rate of Barrett's oesophagus (BE) as well as oesophageal dysplasia (ED). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the detection rates of BE and ED between FB and WATS in adjunct to FB. METHODS: A Literature search was done using electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane and CINAHL from inception to 26 April 2020. A meta-analysis comparing detection rates of WATS in adjunct to FB versus FB using the random-effects model was done using RevMan V.5.3. RESULTS: Pooled data from 20 392 endoscopies across 11 studies showed an absolute increase in detection of 16% (95% CI 0.10% to 0.22%, p<0.00001). A relative increase of 1.62 was seen in detection rates of BE (95% CI 1.28 to 2.05, p<0.0001) when WATS was used with FB with the number needed to test (NNT) of 6.1 patients. For ED, a 2% absolute increase (95% CI 0.01 to 0.03, p=0.001) in additional diagnostic yield from WATS. A relative increase of 2.05 was seen in the detection rate of ED (95% CI 1.42 to 2.98, p=0.0001) yielding an NNT of 50 patients. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that WATS, as an adjunct to FB, improves both the absolute detection rate and relative detection rate of both BE and ED as compared to FB alone.


Assuntos
Esôfago de Barrett/diagnóstico , Biópsia/instrumentação , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico , Esôfago/patologia , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Esôfago de Barrett/patologia , Biópsia/métodos , Gerenciamento de Dados , Técnicas de Diagnóstico do Sistema Digestório/estatística & dados numéricos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico do Sistema Digestório/tendências , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
5.
PLoS One ; 15(6): e0234417, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32574171

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Jejunoileal diverticular haemorrhage is a rare disease that is difficult to diagnose and treat. Despite advances in endoscopic technology, recommendations on diagnosis and management for jejunoileal diverticular haemorrhage have remained unchanged and these new options have not been compared against traditional surgical management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the diagnosis, management, and outcome for jejunoileal diverticular haemorrhage cases at our institution over the past 20 years. Data were organized and analysed by chi-square test, student t-test and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: The most utilised diagnostic procedure was computed tomography, followed by enteroscopy, angiography, small bowel flow-through and surgery. Primary treatments included, in a decreasing order, medical therapy, surgery, endoscopy and radiology. Surgical treatment was not associated with rebleeding, but it did result in longer hospital stays and larger blood transfusions than non-surgical treatments. The bleeding-related mortality rate was very low. Notably, there was also little change in the diagnosis and treatment between decades. CONCLUSION: We presented our experience with the diagnosis and management of jejunoileal diverticular haemorrhage, as well as long-term follow-up after treatments that have not been reported previously. Surgical treatment continues to dominate management for jejunoileal diverticular haemorrhage, but we support increasing the role of endoscopy for select patient groups.


Assuntos
Divertículo/diagnóstico , Divertículo/terapia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Doenças do Íleo/diagnóstico , Doenças do Íleo/terapia , Doenças do Jejuno/diagnóstico , Doenças do Jejuno/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Angiografia , Técnicas de Diagnóstico do Sistema Digestório/tendências , Divertículo/cirurgia , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Feminino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/cirurgia , Humanos , Doenças do Íleo/cirurgia , Doenças do Jejuno/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taiwan , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
6.
World J Gastroenterol ; 26(1): 1-10, 2020 Jan 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31933510

RESUMO

Coeliac disease (CD) is a complex condition resulting from an interplay between genetic and environmental factors. When diagnosing the condition, serological testing and genotyping are useful in excluding CD, although the gold standard of testing is currently histopathological examination of the small intestine. There are drawbacks associated with this form of testing however and because of this, novel forms of testing are currently under investigation. Before we develop completely novel tests though, it is important to ask whether or not we can simply use the data we gather from coeliac patients more effectively and build a more accurate snapshot of CD through statistical analysis of combined metrics. It is clear that not one single test can accurately diagnose CD and it is also clear that CD patients can no longer be defined by discrete classifications, the continuum of patient presentation needs to be recognised and correctly captured to improve diagnostic accuracy. This review will discuss the current diagnostics for CD and then outline novel diagnostics under investigation for the condition. Finally, improvements to current protocols will be discussed with the need for a holistic "snapshot" of CD using a number of metrics simultaneously.


Assuntos
Biópsia/métodos , Doença Celíaca/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Diagnóstico do Sistema Digestório/tendências , Testes Sorológicos/métodos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Intestino Delgado/patologia
7.
Rev. esp. enferm. dig ; 111(10): 767-774, oct. 2019. tab, mapas, graf
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-190450

RESUMO

Antecedentes: el programa de formación de la Especialidad de Aparato Digestivo, que deben seguir los Médicos Internos y Residentes de Aparato Digestivo, obliga a que estos dominen la ecografía digestiva diagnóstica y terapéutica. Métodos: la Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva ha realizado una encuesta a los 93 Servicios de Aparato Digestivo con programa de formación de Médicos Internos y Residentes de Aparato Digestivo para conocer la situación exacta de la docencia en ecografía digestiva. Resultados: solo 31 de los 93 (33%) Servicios de Aparato Digestivo podían dar formación en Ecografía Digestiva. Un 33% (48 de 148) de los Médicos Internos y Residentes de Aparato Digestivo no recibían una formación específica en ecografía digestiva, y otro 31% (46 de 148) recibían una formación específica pero en condiciones mejorables. Estas deficiencias afectaban a todas las Comunidades Autónomas de España, 8 de las cuales carecían totalmente de Servicios de Aparato Digestivo con capacidad para formar en Ecografía Digestiva. Conclusiones: existe un déficit importante de Servicios de Aparato Digestivo que puedan dar formación en Ecografía Digestiva a los Médicos Internos y Residentes de Aparato Digestivo y ello provoca una notable desigualdad formativa. Hasta que se pueda revertir esta situación, la Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva ha diseñado un proyecto formativo en Ecografía Digestiva dirigido a dar una docencia adecuada a todos los Médicos Internos y Residentes de Aparato Digestivo que lo necesiten


Background: the training program of the gastroenterology specialty that is mandatory for resident physicians, obliges them to be proficient in diagnostic and therapeutic digestive ultrasound tools. Methodology: the Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva (AEED) performed a survey of the 93 Departments of Gastroenterology with training programs for resident physicians in gastroenterology, in order to assess the exact situation of training in digestive ultrasound in Spain. Results: only 31 of the 93 (33%) Departments of Gastroenterology were able to provide training in Digestive Ultrasound. Moreover, 33% (48 out of 148) of the residents in gastroenterology did not receive specific training in digestive ultrasound. Whereas, 31% (46 out of 148) had received some specific training, but with ample room for improvement. These deficiencies were spread throughout the Spanish regions (Autonomous Communities) in an uneven manner, with almost half totally lacking gastroenterology departments that were capable of providing digestive ultrasound training. Conclusions: there is a significant deficit of gastroenterology departments capable of providing training in digestive ultrasound to residents, causing a significant training inequality. Until this situation can be reversed, the AEED has designed a training project in digestive ultrasound aimed at providing adequate training to all residents in gastroenterology as required


Assuntos
Humanos , Ultrassonografia/tendências , Ultrassom/educação , Gastroenteropatias/diagnóstico por imagem , Gastroenterologia/educação , Técnicas de Diagnóstico do Sistema Digestório/tendências , Especialização/tendências , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/tendências , Educação Médica Continuada/métodos , Internato e Residência/tendências , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricos
8.
Rev. esp. enferm. dig ; 111(8): 633-636, ago. 2019. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-190335

RESUMO

La ecografía digestiva (ED) es una técnica pendiente de ser implantada en la mayoría de servicios de Aparato Digestivo (AD) de nuestro país, en buena parte debido a los problemas que el especialista de AD encuentra para una adecuada formación ya desde la residencia. En muchos servicios de AD donde si se lleva a cabo ED, no se han destinado en realidad los recursos necesarios para desarrollar verdaderas unidades de ED, los equipos ecográficos están obsoletos y no se adaptan a las necesidades asistenciales del especialista de AD. Por todo lo anteriormente expuesto, la ED ocupa un lugar en nuestra especialidad que no le corresponde, fruto probablemente de una inadecuada promoción y/o apoyo a la técnica, que ha infraestimado su utilidad y restado recursos a su implantación definitiva en los servicios de AD. Para que la ED pueda superar estos obstáculos necesita ser considerada con urgencia como un proceso o una sucesión de actividades sustentadas en la evidencia científica y en la experiencia de los profesionales, para conseguir un resultado que satisfaga plenamente las necesidades e implique un mínimo riesgo para el paciente. En el artículo se defiende la necesidad de potenciar la ED como disciplina clave en el proceso diagnóstico de las enfermedades digestivas, considerando a la calidad como el elemento estratégico en el que se fundamenta esta transformación y su mejora


The abdominal ultrasound (AU) is a diagnostic imaging modality that is yet to be established in most Gastrointestinal (GI) Units in Spain. This is largely due to the difficulties that GI specialists face with regard to the appropriate training received when starting the specialty. Insufficient resources have been allocated to develop AU units in many GI units where AUs are performed. The equipment is obsolete and there are no adaptations to the needs of the GI specialist to provide good medical care. Thus, due to all the above, the AU does not hold the position it deserves in our specialty. This probably stems from a lack of impulse and/or support to the technique, which has underestimated its usefulness and has limited the implementation of resources in the GI units. For the AU to overcome these obstacles, it needs to be considered as a process or a series of activities based on scientific evidence and the experience of professionals that achieves a result that covers the patients' needs with minimal risk. In this article, we defend the need to boost AU as a key discipline for the diagnosis of digestive diseases. Quality is considered as the key aspect on which this transformation and improvement is founded


Assuntos
Humanos , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Gastroenteropatias/diagnóstico por imagem , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Melhoria de Qualidade , Técnicas de Diagnóstico do Sistema Digestório/tendências
9.
Obes Surg ; 29(11): 3536-3541, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31201693

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The implementation of high-resolution manometry (HRM) and the Lyon Consensus statement facilitate evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux disease and motility disorders in morbidly obese patients. Therefore, we aimed to investigate prevalence and phenotype of (borderline) GERD and esophageal motility disorders in this population. METHODS: Consecutive morbidly obese (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2) patients were offered evaluation by means of HRM, ambulatory 24-h pH impedance monitoring, endoscopy, and a clinical examination at our tertiary academic center. Data were collected prospectively. RESULTS: Out of 448 eligible individuals, 147 patients (females = 75, 51%) with a median age of 41.6 (33.4; 52.3) years and a BMI of 44 (40.9; 49.4) kg/m2 were included during the study period. The Chicago Classification revealed motility disorders in 50 (34%) patients, dominated by outflow obstruction (18.4%, n = 27) and a novel disorder (7.5%, n = 11), nicknamed jackhammer esophagus (JE). According to the Lyon Consensus, 52 (35.4%) patients had evidence of true GERD, whereas borderline GERD was noted in another 60 (40.8%). Hypersensitive esophagus was observed in 6.8% (n = 10). Sensitivity and specificity of symptoms for GERD were 53.8% and 68.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The current gold standard of assessment revealed that the prevalence of esophageal motility disorders and (borderline) GERD is high in the morbidly obese population. Further longitudinal data are needed to delineate the natural course of novel motility disorders like JE in obesity and to identify risk factors for adverse outcomes following bariatric surgery.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Diagnóstico do Sistema Digestório , Esôfago/fisiologia , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/complicações , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Manometria , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Adulto , Técnicas de Diagnóstico do Sistema Digestório/história , Técnicas de Diagnóstico do Sistema Digestório/tendências , Transtornos da Motilidade Esofágica/epidemiologia , Transtornos da Motilidade Esofágica/etiologia , Transtornos da Motilidade Esofágica/fisiopatologia , Monitoramento do pH Esofágico , Feminino , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/epidemiologia , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/fisiopatologia , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Masculino , Manometria/história , Manometria/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/diagnóstico , Obesidade Mórbida/epidemiologia , Obesidade Mórbida/fisiopatologia , Prevalência , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
12.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 97(4): e9691, 2018 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29369192

RESUMO

Mirizzi Syndrome is a rare and challenging clinical entity to manage. However, recent advances in technology have provided surgeons with new options for more effective diagnosis and treatment of this condition. This paper reviews these new diagnostic modalities and treatment approaches for the management of Mirizzi Syndrome.An online search language was performed using PubMed and Web of Science for literature published in English between 2012 and 2017 using the search terms "Mirizzi Syndrome" and "Mirizzi." In total, 16 case series and 11 case reports were identified and analyzed.The most frequently used diagnostic modalities were ultrasound, computed tomography (CT); magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography (MRCP); endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP). A combination of ≥2 diagnostic modalities was frequently used to detect Mirizzi Syndrome. Literature shows that the specific type of Mirizzi Syndrome determined the type of treatment chosen. Open surgery was the preferred option, although there are documented cases of the use of minimally-invasive techniques, even in advanced cases. Laparoscopic, endoscopic or robot-assisted surgery, used individually or in combination with lithotripsy, were all associated with a favorable outcome.As yet, there are no internationally-accepted guidelines for the management of Mirizzi Syndrome. Laparotomy is the preferred surgical technique of choice, although an increasing number of surgeons are beginning to opt for minimally-invasive techniques. The number of papers in the existing literature describing diagnostic and treatment procedures is relatively small at present, thus making it difficult to reasonably propose an evidence-based standard of care for Mirizzi Syndrome.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Diagnóstico do Sistema Digestório/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/tendências , Gerenciamento Clínico , Síndrome de Mirizzi/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Mirizzi/cirurgia , Humanos
14.
Gastroenterology ; 154(2): 289-301, 2018 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28774844

RESUMO

A detailed critique of objective measurements of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) would improve management of patients suspecting of having reflux, leading to rational selection of treatment and better outcomes. Many diagnostic tests for GERD have been developed over the past decades. We analyze their development, positive- and negative-predictive values, and ability to predict response to treatment. These features are important for development of medical, surgical, and endoscopic therapies for GERD. We discuss the value of available diagnostic tests and review their role in management of patients with persistent reflux symptoms despite adequate medical or surgical treatment. This is becoming a significant health economic problem, due to the widespread use of proton pump inhibitors. GERD is believed to cause nonesophageal symptoms, such as those provoked by ear, nose, throat, or respiratory disorders. We analyze the value of GERD diagnostic tests in evaluation of these troublesome, nonesophageal symptoms.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Diagnóstico do Sistema Digestório/tendências , Esofagoscopia/métodos , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Azia/diagnóstico , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Sulfato de Bário/administração & dosagem , Biópsia , Dor no Peito/diagnóstico , Dor no Peito/etiologia , Dor no Peito/terapia , Meios de Contraste/administração & dosagem , Esôfago/diagnóstico por imagem , Esôfago/patologia , Esôfago/cirurgia , Fluoroscopia , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/complicações , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/terapia , Azia/terapia , Humanos , Imagem de Banda Estreita , Pepsina A/análise , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Saliva/química , Inquéritos e Questionários
15.
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 11(6): 531-537, 2017 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28317452

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has a large economic burden with important complications that include esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, and adenocarcinoma. Despite endoscopy, validated patient questionnaires, and traditional ambulatory pH monitoring, the diagnosis of GERD continues to be challenging. Areas covered: This review will explore the difficulties in diagnosing GERD with a focus on new developments, ranging from basic fundamental changes (histology and immunohistochemistry) to direct patient care (narrow-band imaging, impedance, and response to anti-reflux surgery). We searched PubMed using the noted keywords. We included data from full-text articles published in English. Further relevant articles were identified from the reference lists of review articles. Expert commentary: Important advances in novel parameters in intraluminal impedance monitoring such as baseline impedance monitoring has created some insight into alternative diagnostic strategies in GERD. Recent advances in endoscopic assessment of esophageal epithelial integrity via mucosal impedance measurement is questioning the paradigm of prolonged ambulatory testing for GERD. The future of reflux diagnosis may very well be without the need for currently employed technologies and could be as simple as assessing changes in epithelia integrity as a surrogate marker for GERD. However, future studies must validate such an approach.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Diagnóstico do Sistema Digestório/tendências , Esôfago , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores/análise , Difusão de Inovações , Impedância Elétrica , Monitoramento do pH Esofágico/tendências , Esofagoscopia/tendências , Esôfago/química , Esôfago/patologia , Esôfago/fisiopatologia , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/patologia , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/fisiopatologia , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/terapia , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica/tendências , Imagem de Banda Estreita/tendências , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
18.
Clin Lab Med ; 35(3): 503-19, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26297400

RESUMO

Routine biochemical tests generally include serum enzymes, proteins, and other markers useful for identifying hepatobiliary disease in dogs and cats. Obtaining results outside the reference intervals can occur with direct hepatocellular injury, enzyme induction by hepatocytes or biliary epithelium, or decreased hepatic function. However, detection of biochemical abnormalities does not necessarily indicate clinically significant disease. For a comprehensive approach to detection and treatment of hepatobiliary disease, the laboratory results must be correlated with the history and physical examination findings, diagnostic imaging results, and other assays.


Assuntos
Doenças Biliares/veterinária , Testes de Química Clínica/veterinária , Técnicas de Diagnóstico do Sistema Digestório/veterinária , Hepatopatias/veterinária , Animais , Doenças Biliares/sangue , Doenças Biliares/diagnóstico , Doenças Biliares/urina , Biomarcadores/sangue , Biomarcadores/urina , Gatos , Testes de Química Clínica/tendências , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Técnicas de Diagnóstico do Sistema Digestório/tendências , Cães , Hepatopatias/sangue , Hepatopatias/diagnóstico , Hepatopatias/urina , Testes de Função Hepática/tendências , Testes de Função Hepática/veterinária
19.
Clin Lab Med ; 35(3): 521-34, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26297401

RESUMO

Laboratory tests are an important part of the workup of small intestinal diseases in dogs and cats. Especially in chronic cases, when extragastrointestinal causes need to be ruled out, it is important to adhere to a systematic workup. This article details the newest available data on tests to aid this diagnostic process. Once the diagnosis of a chronic enteropathy is made, there are many laboratory tests that can help in monitoring the disease and providing prognostic information. Several new tests being evaluated for clinical usefulness are discussed.


Assuntos
Testes de Química Clínica/veterinária , Técnicas de Diagnóstico do Sistema Digestório/veterinária , Enteropatias/veterinária , Intestino Delgado/fisiopatologia , Animais , Biomarcadores/sangue , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Biomarcadores/urina , Gatos , Testes de Química Clínica/tendências , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Técnicas de Diagnóstico do Sistema Digestório/tendências , Cães , Enteropatias/diagnóstico , Enteropatias/patologia , Enteropatias/fisiopatologia , Intestino Delgado/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...